18 November 2025
FATF ¦ R.14 Money or Value Transfer Services (MVTS)
Recommendation 14: Strengthening Oversight of Money or Value Transfer Services
Money or value transfer services (MVTS) are a backbone of modern payments — covering remittance companies, hawala-style networks, and other non-bank providers that move funds domestically and across borders. Their speed and reach make them essential for financial inclusion and cross-border commerce. At the same time, those very features can be exploited for money laundering, terrorist financing, and sanctions evasion. FATF Recommendation 14 sets out clear expectations for countries to license, monitor, and sanction MVTS providers to mitigate these risks without undermining legitimate use.
Licensing and Registration: The First Line of Defense
Recommendation 14 requires that all natural or legal persons providing MVTS be licensed or registered. This is not a box-ticking exercise — it is a gatekeeping function. Licensing ensures competent authorities can:
- Vet ownership and management for suitability.
- Assess business models and risk exposures.
- Establish accountability for compliance breaches.
A rigorous licensing or registration regime enhances transparency and creates traceability of operators. Crucially, it forms the foundation for ongoing supervisory engagement and the application of proportionate AML/CFT obligations.
Active Monitoring and Compliance Oversight
Licensing alone is not enough. Countries must implement effective systems to monitor MVTS providers and ensure they comply with the full set of relevant FATF obligations. This includes, at minimum:
- Customer due diligence and ongoing monitoring aligned to risk.
- Beneficial ownership transparency for customers and agents.
- Suspicious transaction reporting and sanctions screening.
- Record-keeping with timely access for competent authorities.
- Internal controls, independent audit, and staff training.
Supervision should be risk-based. Providers with higher cross-border flows, complex agent networks, or exposure to high-risk jurisdictions warrant deeper scrutiny. Authorities should use a mix of off-site reviews, targeted thematic inspections, and on-site examinations to test real-world compliance and control effectiveness.
Tackling Unlicensed Activity and Shadow Networks
Recommendation 14 obliges countries to proactively identify MVTS operators that are conducting business without proper authorization. Unlicensed activity is a red flag — often linked to informal networks, nested accounts, or front operations. Competent authorities should deploy:
- Market scans and intelligence from banks, telecoms, and payment processors.
- Data analytics on suspicious transaction flows and corridor anomalies.
- Cooperation with law enforcement and tax authorities.
- Public awareness campaigns to deter consumers from using unlicensed services.
When unauthorized activity is detected, appropriate sanctions must follow. These should be credible, dissuasive, and proportionate — ranging from cease-and-desist orders and administrative penalties to criminal enforcement for egregious cases.
Agent Networks: Inclusion, Oversight, and Accountability
MVTS providers often rely on agents to reach customers, especially in remote or underserved areas. Recommendation 14 addresses agent risk head-on:
- Agents must be licensed or registered by a competent authority, or the MVTS provider must maintain a current, accessible list of agents for authorities in all relevant countries of operation.
- Agents must be included in the provider’s AML/CFT programme. This means proper onboarding, training, transaction monitoring, and controls that reflect the provider’s risk assessment.
- Providers must monitor agents for compliance — testing KYC processes, reviewing suspicious activity handling, and conducting periodic audits.
The message is clear: agents are not an outsourcing loophole. They are part of the regulated perimeter and must meet the same standards of integrity and compliance.
Avoiding Duplication for Already-Regulated Financial Institutions
Recommendation 14 avoids unnecessary duplication. If a natural or legal person is already licensed or registered as a financial institution under national law and is permitted to provide MVTS, and is subject to the full set of FATF obligations, a separate MVTS license is not required. This streamlines regulation while maintaining robust AML/CFT safeguards.
Practical Implications for Policymakers and Supervisors
- Define MVTS clearly in law to capture all relevant business models, including informal value transfer systems.
- Establish fit-and-proper criteria for owners and managers and require disclosure of complex ownership structures.
- Build a risk-based supervisory framework with clear inspection cycles and thematic priorities, focusing on agent oversight, cross-border flows, and high-risk corridors.
- Integrate sanctions screening expectations and ensure providers can promptly implement new listings.
- Coordinate domestically across financial regulators, FIUs, law enforcement, and customs to detect unauthorized activity.
- Promote international cooperation to oversee providers and agents operating across jurisdictions and to address nested or correspondent relationships.
What MVTS Providers Should Do
- Obtain the required license or registration before starting operations and keep all approvals current.
- Implement a risk-based AML/CFT programme that covers all channels, products, and agents.
- Maintain a complete, up-to-date agent registry and make it accessible to competent authorities.
- Monitor agent performance, remediate deficiencies quickly, and terminate relationships where necessary.
- Report suspicious transactions promptly and maintain robust records to support investigations.
- Engage constructively with supervisors and invest in training, technology, and independent testing.
The Bottom Line
Recommendation 14 is about bringing MVTS into a well-regulated, transparent environment where innovation and inclusion are balanced with strong safeguards. Licensing, effective monitoring, agent oversight, and firm action against unauthorized operators are the pillars. When implemented properly, these measures protect customers, uphold financial integrity, and reduce the misuse of fast, cross-border value transfer channels for illicit finance.
FATF Ratings Overview
Luxembourg ¦ FATF Effectiveness & Technical Compliance Ratings
Anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing measures
Luxembourg Mutual Evaluation Report, September 2023
This assessment was adopted by the FATF at its June 2023 Plenary meeting and summarises the anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML/CFT) measures in place in Luxembourg as at the date of the on-site visit: 2-18 November 2022.
Table 1. Effectiveness Ratings
Note: Effectiveness ratings can be either a High- HE, Substantial- SE, Moderate- ME, or Low – LE, level of effectiveness.
IO1 Risk, policy and coordination
Money laundering and terrorist financing risks are identified, assessed and understood, policies are co-operatively developed and, where appropriate, actions co-ordinated domestically to combat money laundering and the financing of terrorism.
Substantial
IO2 International cooperation
International co-operation delivers appropriate information, financial intelligence and evidence, and facilitates action against criminals and their property.
Substantial
IO3 Supervision
Supervisors appropriately supervise, monitor and regulate financial institutions and VASPs for compliance with AML/CFT requirements, and financial institutions and VASPs adequately apply AML/CFT preventive measures, and report suspicious transactions. The actions taken by supervisors, financial institutions and VASPs are commensurate with the risks.
Moderate
IO4 Preventive measures
Supervisors appropriately supervise, monitor and regulate DNFBPs for compliance with AML/CFT requirements, and DNFBPs adequately apply AML/CFT preventive measures commensurate with the risks, and report suspicious transactions.
Moderate
IO5 Legal persons and arrangements
Legal persons and arrangements are prevented from misuse for money laundering or terrorist financing, and information on their beneficial ownership is available to competent authorities without impediments.
Substantial
IO6 Financial intelligence
Financial intelligence and all other relevant information are appropriately used by competent authorities for money laundering and terrorist financing investigations.
Substantial
IO7 ML investigation & prosecution
Money laundering offences and activities are investigated, and offenders are prosecuted and subject to effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions.
Moderate
IO8 Confiscation
Asset recovery processes lead to confiscation and permanent deprivation of criminal property and property of corresponding value.
Moderate
IO9 TF investigation & prosecution
Terrorist financing offences and activities are investigated and persons who finance terrorism are prosecuted and subject to effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions.
Substantial
IO10 TF preventive measures & financial sanctions
Terrorists, terrorist organisations and terrorist financiers are prevented from raising, moving and using funds.
Moderate
IO11 PF financial sanctions
Persons and entities involved in the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction are prevented from raising, moving and using funds, consistent with the relevant UNSCRs.
Moderate
Table 2. Technical Compliance Ratings
Note: Technical compliance ratings can be either a C – compliant, LC – largely compliant, PC – partially compliant or NC – non compliant.
R.1 Assessing Risks and applying a Risk-Based Approach
C – compliant
R.2 National Co-operation and Co-ordination
C – compliant
R.3 Money laundering offence
C – compliant
R.4 Confiscation and provisional measures
LC – largely compliant
R.5 Terrorist financing offence
C – compliant
R.6 Targeted financial sanctions related to terrorism and terrorist financing
LC – largely compliant
R.7 Targeted financial sanctions related to proliferation
LC – largely compliant
R.8 Non-profit organisations
PC – partially compliant
R.9 Financial institution secrecy laws
C – compliant
R.10 Customer due diligence
C – compliant
R.11 Record-keeping
C – compliant
R.12 Politically exposed persons
C – compliant
R.13 Correspondent banking
C – compliant
R.14 Money or value transfer services (MVTS)
C – compliant
R.15 New technologies
LC – largely compliant
R.16 Payment transparency
C – compliant
R.17 Reliance on third parties
C – compliant
R.19 Higher-risk countries
C – compliant
R.20 Reporting of suspicious transactions
C – compliant
R.21 Tipping-off and confidentiality
C – compliant
R.22 DNFBPs: Customer due diligence
C – compliant
R.23 DNFBPs: Other measures
C – compliant
R.24 Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal persons
LC – largely compliant
R.27 Powers of supervisors
C – compliant
R.28 Regulation and supervision of DNFBPs
C – compliant
R.29 Financial intelligence units
C – compliant
R.30 Responsibilities of law enforcement and investigative authorities
LC – largely compliant
R.32 Cash Couriers
LC – largely compliant
R.33 Statistics
LC – largely compliant
R.34 Guidance and feedback
C – compliant
R.35 Sanctions
LC – largely compliant
R.36 International instruments
LC – largely compliant
R.37 Mutual legal assistance
C – compliant
R.38 Mutual legal assistance: freezing and confiscation
C – compliant
R.39 Extradition
C – compliant
R.40 Other forms of international co-operation
LC – largely compliant