Responsable du Contrôle (RC) – Anti-Financial Crime & AML/CFT/CPF Focus Luxembourg

Responsable du Contrôle (RC) – Anti-Financial Crime & AML/CFT/CPF Focus Luxembourg

Notice

The following information is provided for general informational purposes and does not form part of our editorial content. It relates to our professional services in Financial Crime.

The services described are provided byconcilio et labore GmbHconcilio et labore GmbH, which was founded by Bastian Schwind-Wagner. Bastian is a Certified Anti-Financial Crime Professional (CAFCP), a qualification validated by TU Dublin.

Overview

The Responsable du Contrôle (RC) is a statutory senior function in Luxembourg with primary responsibility for overseeing the organisation’s control environment – including Anti-Financial Crime (AFC) / AML/CFT/CPF, sanctions, and related compliance controls. The RC role is key to demonstrating to the CSSF, AED, and other supervisors that controls are effective, independently monitored, and that issues are escalated and remediated promptly.

Regulatory and organisational context in Luxembourg

Supervisory expectations require the RC to:

  • be independent of the operational lines it monitors and have direct access to senior management and the board
  • maintain sufficient authority, resources and expertise to evaluate the adequacy and effectiveness of controls across AML/CFT/CPF, sanctions, and financial crime areas
  • deliver clear, timely, and actionable reporting to management bodies, including evidence of testing, findings and remediation progress
  • participate in governance processes that ensure corrective actions are prioritised and completed
  • be able to explain control effectiveness and evidence oversight during CSSF/AED inspections and thematic reviews

An effective RC role supports management bodies in meeting fit and proper and governance expectations and provides supervisors with assurance that control deficiencies are identified and addressed.

When the RC role should be strengthened

Typical triggers include:

  • establishment of new regulated activity or material change in business model
  • shortcomings identified by internal or external audit, AML/CFT/CPF reviews, or supervisory findings
  • increased reliance on delegation or outsourcing for AML/CFT/CPF and KYC activities
  • preparation for a CSSF/AED inspection or following supervisory recommendations
  • need to elevate the independence and rigour of control testing and monitoring

Core responsibilities of the RC (AFC/AML/CFT/CPF focus)

The RC provides independent control assurance across the AFC framework.

Key responsibilities typically include:

  • designing and maintaining a risk-based control testing programme covering AML/CFT/CPF, sanctions, transaction monitoring, KYC & CDD, and outsourced AML/CFT/CPF activities
  • performing or commissioning periodic testing and independent reviews to assess both design and operational effectiveness of AFC controls
  • validating remediation plans and monitoring progress until completion, including tracking root cause remediation and control improvements
  • producing regular, board level reports and dashboards that present findings, risk trends, remediation status and residual risk metrics in a format suitable for senior management and the board
  • ensuring coordination with internal audit, compliance, AML/CFT/CPF Officers and other assurance functions to avoid duplication and maximise coverage
  • escalating material control failures promptly and ensuring appropriate management action plans are in place and followed up
  • contributing to policy and procedure reviews from a control effectiveness perspective and advising on compensating controls where immediate remediation is required

Independence, expertise and resourcing

CSSF/AED expectations emphasise that the RC must be sufficiently independent and resourced:

  • structural independence from the first line operations whose controls are being tested (reporting lines and compensation arrangements should avoid conflicts)
  • documented mandate, clear terms of reference, and direct access to the board / audit committee for raising material concerns
  • appropriate professional expertise in AML/CFT/CPF, sanctions, transaction monitoring and Luxembourg regulatory expectations
  • appropriate team resourcing and external support where specialist testing (e.g., transaction monitoring system validation, sanctions screening effectiveness) is required

Practical deliverables and evidence

To meet supervisory scrutiny, the RC should produce documented evidence that includes:

  • a risk-based control testing plan aligned to the entity’s AML/CFT/CPF risk assessment
  • test procedures, sampling rationale and execution evidence for each review
  • clear findings, risk ratings, management responses and remediation tracking logs
  • trend analysis and heat maps that help boards understand residual risk and resource prioritisation
  • documented co-ordination with internal audit and compliance to ensure complete assurance coverage

How the RC role complements other governance functions

The RC operates alongside internal audit, the AML/CFT/CPF Officer, compliance and the board. Its purpose is to provide independent, pragmatic assurance on control effectiveness and remediation – bridging operational testing and board level oversight. Effective coordination with other assurance providers reduces duplication and strengthens the overall control environment.

When to seek external RC support or temporary appointment

Entities may engage external RC support when:

  • recruiting a permanent RC (to ensure continuity and independence during the transition)
  • needing specialist testing skills (large TM system validation, sanctions testing, or complex KYC file reviews)
  • the existing function requires temporary capacity to manage a remediation spike or inspection preparation
  • independent perspective is needed to restore supervisor confidence following findings

How this service fits within broader AFC workstreams

RC activity links directly to AML/CFT/CPF risk assessment, transaction monitoring validation, KYC & CDD quality reviews, sanctions testing, remediation delivery, AML/CFT/CPF internal audit, and CSSF/AED inspection preparation. Independent control testing and strong RC reporting materially strengthen governance and supervisory defensibility.

Contact and next steps

If you need to establish, strengthen, or temporarily supplement the Responsable du Contrôle (RC) function to improve AFC control assurance, remediation oversight, or inspection readiness, a structured, risk-based control testing and reporting programme aligned to Luxembourg supervisory expectations is essential.